7260. Adulteration and misbranding of soy bean oil meal.    TJ. S. v. Soya Process¬
ing Co. Plea .of guilty. Fine, $400. (F. D. C. No. 12623. Sample No. 
33251-F.)
INFORMATION FILED : November 14, 1944, Northern District of Ohio, against the 
Soya Processing Co., a corporation, Wooster, Ohio.
ALLEGED SHIPMENT : On or about April 25, 1944, from the State of Ohio into the 
State of Maryland.
LABEL IN PART: "Wooster Brand Soy Bean Oil Meal Guaranteed Analysis 
Protein 41% Minimum."
VIOLATIONS CHARGED: Adulteration, Section 402 (b) (2), a mixture of soy bean 
oil meal and calcium carbonate had been substituted in whole or in part for 
soy bean oil meal, which the article was represented to be.
Misbranding, Section 408 (a), the statements, "Guaranteed Analysis" and 
"Protein 41% Minimum," were false and misleading since the product contained 
not more than 37.05 percent of protein; and, Section 403 (i) (2), it was 
fabricated from two or more ingredients and its label failed to bear the common 
or usual name of each such ingredient, since the article contained 6.32 percent 
of calcium carbonate and the label failed to bear the name of that ingredient
DISPOSITION : December 5, 1944. A plea of guilty having been entered, a fine of 
$200 on "each of 2 counts was imposed.