7933. Adulteration and misbranding of noodles.    TJ. S. v. Kurtz Brothers.    Plea
of nolo contendere.    Fine, $350.     (F. D. C. No. 14241.    Sample Nos. 51197-F, 
51198-F.)
INFORMATION FILED:January 23,1945, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, against 
Kurtz Brothers, a partnership, Bridgeport, Pa.
ALLEGED SHIPMENT:    On or about February 3, 1944, from the State of Penn- 
sylvania into the State of Delaware. 
LABEL, IN PART:   "Kurtz [or "King Brand"] Pure Egg Noodles."
VIOLATIONS CHARGED: Adulteration, Section 402 (b) (1), a valuable con- 
stituent, eggs, had been in whole or in part omitted, in that the product pur- 
ported to be and was represented as egg noodles, a product which should con- 
tain not less than 5% percent of egg solids, whereas it contained less than 
that amount; and, Section 402 (b) (2), noodles deficient in egg solids had 
been substituted in whole or in part for egg noodles.
Misbranding, Section 403 (a), the label statement "Pure Egg Noodles" was 
false and misleading.
DISPOSITION : March 23, 1945. A plea of nolo contendere having been entered, 
the defendant was fined $250.