10692. Misbranding of India Chutney.    U. S. v. 60 Cases    *    *    *.     (F. D. C. No.
18161.    Sample Nos. 7875-H, 7878-H.)
Chutney" and "London Tower" were misleading since they created the im- 
pression that the article was of foreign origin, whereas it was of domestic 
origin; Section 403 (e) (2), the article failed to bear a label containing an 
accurate statement of the quantity of the contents since the package contained 
less than the declared weight; Section 403 (f), the statement of the ingredients 
which the law requires to appear on the label was not prominently placed 
thereon with such conspicuousness (as compared with other words, statements, 
and designs in the labeling) as to render it likely to be read by the ordinary 
individual under customary conditions of purchase and use, since the informa- 
tion appeared on a side panel of the jar wrapper; and, Section 403 (i) (2), the 
article was fabricated from 2 or more ingredients, and its label failed to bear 
the common or usual name of each such ingredient, since the label statement 
"Vegetable and Protein Extracts" is not the common or usual name of any 
ingredient.
DISPOSITION: November 7, 1945. No claimant having appeared, judgment of 
condemnation was entered and the product was ordered distributed to chari- 
table institutions.
MISCELLANEOUS FOODS