15836. Mfelrranding of canned peas.   U. S. v. 750 Cases   *   *   *   (aftd 1 other 
- seizure action).    (F. D. C. Nos. 28513, 28514.    Sample Nos. 61850-K,
61851-K.)
The cans were unlabeled, with the exception of Some which bore the word 
"Peas."
NATURE OF CHARGE: Misbranding, Section 403 (e) (1), the article failed td bear 
a label containing the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, 
or distributor; Section 403 (e) (2), the article failed to bear a label containing 
an accurate statement of the quantity of the contents; and, Section 403 (h) 
(1), the quality of the article fell below the standard of quality for canned 
peas because of high al^dhor-ifisoluble solids, and its label failed to bear a 
statement that it fell below such standard.
DISPOSITION : February 20, 1950. The Bohn-Lenartz Co., St. Louis, Mo., claim- 
ant, having consented to the entry of decrees, judgments of condemnation were 
entered and the court ordered that the product be released under bond for 
relabeling under the supervision of the Federal Security Agency.
TOMATOES AND TOMATO PRODUCTS