17138* Misbranding of canned tomatoes.   IK S. v. 844 Cases   * . * f *;    (F.D; C. 
No.29776.    Sample No. 66953-K.) 
-^ ; "•«>>' !-   :
LIBEL Fpjp:   October 9, 195^ Eastern District;of North Carolina, P;?;/   ?•? ?¦;, ;
ALLEGED SHIPMENT:   On or about August IS and 19,1950,by JJD, Baynor, from 
;  Litwalton,lTa. 
U^:l^\.l^.': ;-.^-v if. -t-o; :-^:'K->"•; :tit
PRODUCT: 844 cases, each containing 24 i^to'^V'^-bwc^/'canSi",^ tomatoes 
at Zebulon, N. C. 
LkBEL, IN PART: (Can) "Jo Bussf Tomatoes Brinkley & Council,1 Litwalton, 
Virginia." 
' ;¦;;       ¦V::,:   '-' ¦"   ¦'¦¦¦¦••¦¦¦¦¦¦•¦ ¦¦';:-;       ¦;»;¦<¦-•¦¦¦„>
NATURE OF CHARGE:   Misbranding,  Section 403   (h)   (1), the quality of the 
:  article fell below the standard of quality for canned tomatoes "because of the 
low drained weight, and the label failed to bear a statement' that the article fell 
. below such standard. 
a' 
.   n
DISPOSITION : April 11, 1951. Southeastern Brokerage Co.',' hic.', *" Wilfni ngton, 
)N. C;, claimant, having admitted the allegations of: the libel, judgment of con- 
demnation was entered and the court ordered that the product be'released
;. .under bond for relabeling, under; the supervision.Pf the Food and Drug;?Ad-
ministration. 
..; '¦; 5    5 ? • i