26296. Pollen Gold The Wonder Food and Pollen Gold Food Supplement. (F.D.C. No. 42277. S. Noa 41-583/4 P.) QUANTITY : 72 boxes, consisting of various flavors of Pollen Gold The Wonder Food and 45 boxes of Pollen Gold Food Supplement at Portland, Oreg. SHIPPED: Between 8-27-58 and 9-26-58, from Wenatchee, Wash., by L. C. Antles, Fruit Tree Pollen Supplies Co. LABEL IN PART: (BOX) "L. C. Antles Pollen Gold The Wonder Food Con- tents—Honey, Pollen, Dry Skim Milk, Flavoring Net Wt. 8 Oz.", and "L. C. Antles Pollen Gold Food Supplement Contents Approximately Half Pollen, half Honey * * * Capsules Net Weight 7 Ounces." ACCOMPANYING LABELING: Leaflets entitled "Pollen Gold—A Wonderful Food Promotion and Clarification"; "Pollen Analysis * * * The Chemical Composi- tion and Nutritional Value of Pollens"; "L. C. Antler Pollen Gold (Pollen Nectar)"; "The Value of Pollen as a Food For Bees The Bee World November, 1940"; "Pollen Analysis The Chemical Composition and Nutritional Value of Pollens Collected by Bees"; "Laucks Testing Laboratories Report Descrip- tion Date Number"; "L. C. Antles Pollen Gold Pollen Nectar"; and "L. C. Antler Pollen Gold Pollen Nectar * * * L. C. Antles Supply Co." LIBELED: 11-12-58, Dist. Oreg. CHARGE: 403(a)—the labeling of the articles, when shipped, contained false and misleading representations that the articles when used as directed or as customary or usual would supply most of the vitamins, minerals, and vitaliz- ing food materials necessary to carry on life; that they would supply miracu- lous vitamins and minerals; that they would be an important source of vita- mins, minerals, amino acids, protein, and fat and would satisfy a "hidden hunger" of the human body; and 403(j)—the articles purported to be and were represented as foods for special dietary use by reason of their use as a means of regulating the intake of protein, fat, carbohydrate, or calories, for the purpose of controlling body weight, and the labels of each article failed to bear, as required by regulations a statement of the percent by weight of pro^ tern, fat, and available carbohydrates in the article, and the number of avail- able calories supplied by a specified quantity of the article. The libel alleged also that the articles were misbranded under the provisions of the law applicable to drugs, as reported in notices of judgment on drugs and devices No. 5805. DISPOSITION : 1-2-59. Consent—claimed by L. C. Antles and relabeled.