Product Keywords: canned peas / Adjudicating Courts: Eastern District of Missouri - FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966 Search Results

Start Over Product Keywords canned peas ✖ Adjudicating Courts Eastern District of Missouri ✖

1. 10164. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 800 and 840 Cases of Canned Peas. Consent decrees of condemnation. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: Geidel Canneries, Inc.
Issue Dates:: November 1947

2. 10437. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 1,298 Cases.

Defendants:: Tigerton Foods
Issue Dates:: January 1948

3. 11665. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 596 Cases.

Defendants:: Friday Canning Corp.
Issue Dates:: July 1948

4. 11795. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 1,138 Cases.

Defendants:: Cobb Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: August 1948

5. 12136. Adulteration of canned peas. U. S. v. 84 Cases.

Defendants:: Oconomowoc Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: September 1948

6. 12142. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 583 Cases.

Defendants:: Elkhart Lake Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: September 1948

7. 12954. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 450 Cases.

Defendants:: Valders Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: February 1949

8. 13316. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 774 Cases.

Defendants:: Charles H. Johnston's Sons Co.
Issue Dates:: June 1940

9. 13318. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 239 Cases.

Defendants:: N. Comensky Grocer Co.
Issue Dates:: June 1940

10. 13319. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 150 Cases.

Defendants:: Bert Grossman, trading as the Mitchell Grossman Wholesale Grocer Co.
Issue Dates:: June 1940

11. 14069. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 70 Cases.

Defendants:: Lord Mott Co., Inc.
Issue Dates:: October 1949

12. 14331. Misbranding and alleged adulteration of canned peas. U. S. v. 543 Cases of Canned Peas. Decree entered, adjudging product misbranded and ordering its release under bond.

Defendants:: Rosen-Reichardt Brokerage Co.
Issue Dates:: October, 1926

13. 14638. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 399 Cases.

Defendants:: Oostburg Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: November 1949

14. 15836. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 750 Cases (and 1 other seizure action).

Defendants:: Oostburg Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: July 1950

15. 19410. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 1,132 Cases, et al., of Canned Peas. Judgments entered ordering product released under bond to be relabeled.

Defendants:: H. M. Crites & Co.
Issue Dates:: December, 1932

16. 4422. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 550 Cases of Canned Peas. Default decree of condemnation and sale.

Defendants:: Oostburg Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: December 1943

17. 6135. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 220 Cases of Peas (and 1 other seizure action involving canned peas). Consent decrees of condemnation. Product ordered released under bond for relabeling.

Defendants:: Columbia Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: April 1945

18. 6137. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 185 Cases of Canned Peas. Consent decree of condemnation. Product ordered released under bond to be relabeled.

Defendants:: Waldo Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: April 1945

19. 6138. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 69 Cases of Peas. Default decree of condemnation. Product ordered sold in compliance with the law.

Defendants:: Pardeeville Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: April 1945

20. 6526. Misbranding of canned peas. U. S. v. 400 Cases of Canned Peas. Consent decree of condemnation. Product ordered released under bond to be relabeled.

Defendants:: Oostburg Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: June 1945