FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966

Search

Start Over Titles 18283. Adulteration and misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. Rush Canning Co. and James O. Harris and William T. Ash. Pleas of nolo contendere. Each individual defendant fined $600. No fine imposed against company. ✖Remove constraint Titles: 18283. Adulteration and misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. Rush Canning Co. and James O. Harris and William T. Ash. Pleas of nolo contendere. Each individual defendant fined $600. No fine imposed against company. Defendants Rush Canning Co., a partnership, trading at Exeter and Washburn, Mo., and James O. Harris and William T. Ash, partners in the firm. ✖Remove constraint Defendants: Rush Canning Co., a partnership, trading at Exeter and Washburn, Mo., and James O. Harris and William T. Ash, partners in the firm. Product Keywords canned tomatoes ✖Remove constraint Product Keywords: canned tomatoes

Refine by:

  • 18283. Adulteration and misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. Rush Canning Co. and James O. Harris and William T. Ash. Pleas of nolo contendere. Each individual defendant fined $600. No fine imposed against company.1

  • Rush Canning Co., a partnership, trading at Exeter and Washburn, Mo., and James O. Harris and William T. Ash, partners in the firm.1