Product Keywords: canned tomatoes / Adjudicating Courts: Northern District of Texas - FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966 Search Results

Start Over Product Keywords canned tomatoes ✖ Adjudicating Courts Northern District of Texas ✖

1. 19947. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 700 Cases, et al., of Canned Tomatoes. Decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond

Defendants:: Baron Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: May, 1933

2. 20447. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 152 Cases, et al., of Canned Tomatoes. Default decrees of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Baron Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: January 1934

3. 22749. Adulteration of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 211 Cases of Canned Tomatoes. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Johnson Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: March 1935

4. 10889. Adulteration and misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 750 Cans (Cases) of Tomatoes. Decree ordering release of the product.

Defendants:: R. G. Layman & Sons, Cloverdale, Va.
Issue Dates:: January, 1923

5. 25766. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 1,049 Cases of Canned Tomatoes. Consent decree of condemnation. Product released under bond to be relabeled.

Defendants:: Lick Branch Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: November 1936

6. 30119. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 788 Cases of Canned Tomatoes. Default decree of condemnation. Product sold to a charitable institution for a nominal sum.

Defendants:: Gassville Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: June 1939

7. 14796. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 899 Cases.

Defendants:: W. B. Hestand Grocery Co.
Issue Dates:: January 1950