Collections: Foods and Drugs, 1908-1943 / Adjudicating Courts: Supreme Court of the District of Columbia - FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966 Search Results

Start Over Collections Foods and Drugs, 1908-1943 ✖ Adjudicating Courts Supreme Court of the District of Columbia ✖

1. 4245. Adulteration of pepper. U. S. v. 200 Boxes of an Article Purporting to be Pepper. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product ordered released on bond.

Defendants:: Parrish Bros., a corporation, Baltimore, Md.
Issue Dates:: May 19, 1916

2. 4310. (Supplement to Notice of Judgment 3869.) Misbranding of Buffalo lithia water. U. S. v. 7 Cases, more or less, of Buffalo Lithia Water. Decision of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, affirming the decree of condemnation by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Case pending on writ of error in the Supreme Court of the United States.

Issue Dates:: August 8, 1916

3. 4847. Adulteration and misbranding of vinegar. U. S. v. 284 Barrels Vinegar. Consent decree of condemnation andd forfeiture. Product ordered released on bond.

Defendants:: Geo. Naas and George H. Naas, trading as Geo. Naas & Son Co., Cohocton, N. Y.
Issue Dates:: September 18, 1917

4. 4916. Adulteration of frozen eggs. U. S. v. 92 Cases of Frozen Eggs. Consent decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Louis Spickloser, Washington, D. C.
Issue Dates:: October 17, 1917

5. 4958. Adulteration of eggs. U. S. v. 350 Cases of Eggs. Consent decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Louis Spickloser
Issue Dates:: January 30, 1918

6. 5027. Adulteration of tomatoes. U. S. v. 83 Cases Tomatoes. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Stanwix Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: January 28, 1918

7. 5073. Adulteration of tomato pulp. U. S. v. 20 Cases of Tomato Pulp. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Hartlove Packing Co., Baltimore, Md.
Issue Dates:: January 29, 1918

8. 7460. Misbranding of Black-Caps. U. S. v. 4 Dozen and 17 Dozen Packages of Black-Caps. Default decrees of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Black Drug Co.
Issue Dates:: September 24, 1920

9. 6513. Adulteration and misbranding of sauerkraut. U. S. v. Fifty Cases of Sauerkraut. Default decree of condemnation and forfeiture.

Defendants:: W. E. Robinson & Co.
Issue Dates:: December 29, 1919

10. 6726. Adulteration of tomato pulp. U. S. v. 50 Cases of Tomato Pulp. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Roberts Brothers, Baltimore, Md.
Issue Dates:: April 9, 1920

11. 6735. Adulteration of tomato pulp. U, S. v. 25 Cases of Tomato Pulp. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: S. M. Robinson & Co., Baltimore, Md..
Issue Dates:: April 9, 1920

12. 6957. Adulteration and misbranding of Cacapon Healing Water. U. S. v. 6 Barrels and 40 Kegs of Cacapon Healing Water. Consent decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Cacapon Co., Washington, D. C.
Issue Dates:: July 1, 1920

13. 3533. Adulteration of tomato catsup. U. S. v. 10 Cases, More or Less, of Tomato Catsup. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Cruikshank Bros.
Issue Dates:: May 14, 1915

14. 3534. Adulteration of tomato catsup. U. S. v. 4 Cases, More or Less, of Tomato Catsup. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Cruikshank Bros.
Issue Dates:: May 14, 1915

15. 3542. Adulteration and misbranding of tomato catsup. U. S. v. 10 Cases, More or Less, of Tomato Catsup. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: E. C. Flaccus Co.
Issue Dates:: May 14, 1915

16. 3551. Adulteration of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 109 Cases, More on Less, of Tomatoes. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product ordered destroyed.

Defendants:: Richmond Lunch
Issue Dates:: May 14, 1915

17. 3572. Adulteration of dried apples. U. S. v. 10 Bags Dried Apples. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: A. W. Kelley & Company
Issue Dates:: May 14, 1915

18. 3673. Adulteration of canned beans. U. S. v. 21 Cases Canned Beans. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: J. Ludington & Co.
Issue Dates:: June 15, 1915

19. 3756. Adulteration and misbranding of apples. U. S. v. 14 Barrels of Apples. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Issue Dates:: July 13, 1915

20. 3769. Adulteration of tomato pulp. U. S. v. 50 Cases of Tomato Pulp. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: D. E. Foote & Co.
Issue Dates:: July 13, 1915

21. 3855. Adulteration of cream. U. S. v. Alexander F. Pilcher. Plea of guilty. Fine, $10.

Defendants:: Alexander F. Pilcher, late of the District aforesaid
Issue Dates:: August 13, 1915

22. 3868. (Supplement to Notice of Judgment 1056.) Alleged misbranding of antikamnia tablets. United States of America, plaintiff in error and appellant, v. The Antikamnia Chemical Co. Decree of the lower court, sustaining the exceptions to the libel, reversed.

Defendants:: Antikamnia Chemical Co.
Issue Dates:: August 13, 1915

23. 3869. Misbranding of Buffalo Iithia water. U. S. v. 7 Cases, more or less, of Buffalo Lithia Water. Tried to the court. Judgment for the Government. Product ordered released on bond.

Defendants:: Rosa C. Goode et al.
Issue Dates:: August 13, 1915

24. 3876. Misbranding of Londonderry lithia water. U. S. v. 4 Cases of Londonderry Lithia Water. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product ordered destroyed. Subdivision (b) of count 3 of the libel dismissed.

Defendants:: Londonderry Lithia Spring Water Co., Nashua, N. H.
Issue Dates:: August 13, 1915

25. 3912. Adulteration and misbranding of so-called bran. U. S. v. 1,200 Sacks of Wheat Bran. Product released on bond. Order of dismissal.

Defendants:: Dunlop Mills, Richmond, Va.
Issue Dates:: September 24, 1915

26. 3914. Adulteration and misbranding of beer. U. S. v. 100 Cases of Beer. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product ordered released on bond.

Defendants:: Chr. Heurich Brewing Co.
Issue Dates:: September 24, 1915

27. 3960. Adulteration of dried apples and dried huckleberries. U. S. v. 11 Barrels of Dried Apples and 1 Barrel of Dried Huckleberries. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Issue Dates:: October 21, 1915

28. 4071. Misbranding of "Erdoline." U. S. v. 22 Cases of "Erdoline." Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Glass Glass One Dozen Erdoline from the Oleon Chemical Co.
Issue Dates:: February 25, 1916

29. 3197. Adulteration of chestnuts. U. S. v. 3 Bags of Chestnuts. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Issue Dates:: September 11, 1914

30. 3198. Adulteration of chestnuts. U. S. v. 5 Bags of Chestnuts. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Issue Dates:: September 11, 1914

31. 3209. Adulteration of tomato pulp. U. S. v. 200 Cases of Tomato Pulp. Default decree of condemnation., forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: D. B. Foote & Co., Inc., Baltimore, Md. (Rubber stamp) P. K. Chaconas & Co., Washington, D C
Issue Dates:: September 11, 1914

32. 3210. Adulteration of chestnuts U. S. v. 36 Bags of Chestnuts. Default decree of condemnation forfeiture, and destruction.

Issue Dates:: September 11, 1914

33. 3397. Alleged misbranding of Hurdle Brand Holland Gin. U. S. v. 5 Cases of a Liquid Food Known as " Hurdle Brand Holland Gin." Tried to the court. Finding in favor of claimant. Order dis misbranding libel and directing marshal to release goods.

Defendants:: Albert E. Beitzel
Issue Dates:: January 11, 1915

34. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 498, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. In the case of the United States ex rel. Alsop Process Company, petitioner, vs. James Wilson, Secretary of Agriculture, a mandamus proceeding in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to restrain the Secretary of Agriculture from publishing and circulating Food Inspection Decision No. 100 of the United States Department of Agriculture relative to flour bleached by the Alsop Process, and to compel cancellation of said decision.

Defendants:: Alsop Process Company
Issue Dates:: August 30, 1910

35. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 531, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF CURRANTS AND RAISINS.

Issue Dates:: September 6, 1910

36. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 600, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. MISBRANDING OF MACARONI.

Defendants:: A. Ricchezza, Philadelphia, Pa.
Issue Dates:: October 13, 1910

37. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 776, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. MISBRANDING OF MACARONI.

Defendants:: L. Verno, Philadelphia, Pa.
Issue Dates:: March 15, 1911

38. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 782, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF FROZEN EGGS.

Defendants:: Althoff, C. B.
Issue Dates:: March 15, 1911

39. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 789, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF SHUCKED OYSTERS.

Defendants:: Roberts, L. J.
Issue Dates:: March 27, 1911

40. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 790, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF A FOOD PRODUCT MACLAREN'S IMPERIAL CHEESE.

Defendants:: MaClaren Imperial Cheese Co.
Issue Dates:: March 27, 1911

41. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 805, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF SPICED CATSUP.

Defendants:: R. C. Chances's Sons
Issue Dates:: March 31, 1911

42. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 822, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. MISBRANDING OF LONDONDERRY LITHIA WATER.

Issue Dates:: May 5, 1911

43. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 833, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF PRUNES.

Defendants:: Northwest Fruit Association
Issue Dates:: May 5, 1911

44. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 891, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. MISBRANDING OF A DRUG PRODUCT "MAKE-MAN TABLETS."

Defendants:: Make-Man Tablet Co.
Issue Dates:: June 16, 1911

45. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 924, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. MISBRANDING OF HARRIS' LITHIA WATER.

Defendants:: T. H. Atkinson
Issue Dates:: July 13, 1911

46. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1370. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF MARASCHINO CHERRIES.

Issue Dates:: May 17, 1912

47. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1371. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF TOMATOES.

Defendants:: Pearson & Son
Issue Dates:: May 17, 1912

48. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1413. (Given pursuant to section i of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF BROOKE'S LEMOS (LEMON JUICE).

Defendants:: C. M. Brooke & Sons
Issue Dates:: May 18, 1912

49. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1416. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF EVAPORATED APPLES.

Defendants:: Elphonzo Youngs Co. (Inc.) and David Wallerstein & Co.
Issue Dates:: May 18, 1912

50. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1515. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF MILK.

Defendants:: Richard D. Hawkins, Boyds, Md.
Issue Dates:: July 13, 1912

51. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1523. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF BANANA CORDIAL.

Issue Dates:: July 13, 1912

52. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1525. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF LIGHT SKIM CHEESE.

Defendants:: Hunter Walton & Co.
Issue Dates:: July 13, 1912

53. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1527. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF OYSTERS IN SHELL.

Defendants:: Henry Stewart
Issue Dates:: July 13, 1912

54. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1565. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF WALNUTS.

Defendants:: William Maass
Issue Dates:: August 21, 1912

55. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1566. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF OYSTERS IN SHELL.

Defendants:: J. T. Robey
Issue Dates:: August 21, 1912

56. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1604. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF OYSTERS IN SHELL.

Issue Dates:: August 30, 1912

57. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1697. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF SO-CALLED OLIVE OIL.

Defendants:: Sebastian F. McCormick and Rudolph C. Thomas, copartners, trading as McCormick, Thomas & Co.
Issue Dates:: October 17, 1912

58. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1714. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF TOMATO KETCHUP.

Defendants:: Winfield S. Brown, trading as W. S. Brown & Co.
Issue Dates:: October 24, 1912

59. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1718. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF SHUCKED OYSTERS.

Issue Dates:: October 24, 1912

60. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1724. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) MISBRANDING OF SO-CALLED COMPOUND CATSUP.

Defendants:: Arthur Leslie Sauce Co., Norfolk, Va.
Issue Dates:: October 24, 1912

61. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1726. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) MISBRANDING OF SO-CALLED SPARKLING BURGUNDY WINE.

Defendants:: Victor Gauthier & Sons
Issue Dates:: October 24, 1912

62. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1729. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF TOMATO CATSUP.

Defendants:: Atlas Preserving Co.
Issue Dates:: October 24, 1912

63. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1739. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF CHEESE.

Defendants:: D. W. Whitmore & Co.
Issue Dates:: October 24, 1912

64. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1741. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF SHUCKED OYSTERS.

Defendants:: H. Javins & Sons
Issue Dates:: October 24, 1912

65. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1755. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF SO-CALLED PEACH-FLAVORED CORDIAL.

Defendants:: J. A. Leary Co.
Issue Dates:: October 26, 1912

66. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1768. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF FLOUR.

Defendants:: Wm. M. Gait & Co., a copartnership
Issue Dates:: November 30, 1913

67. NOTTCE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1791. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF OYSTERS.

Issue Dates:: November 30, 1912

68. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1794. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION OF OYSTERS.

Defendants:: George Ellis
Issue Dates:: November 30, 1912

69. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1835. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) MISBRANDING OF MOLASSES.

Defendants:: T. B. Metzel Co., a corporation, Philadelphia, Pa.
Issue Dates:: January 11, 1913

70. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 1877. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF SO-CALLED PEACH CORDIAL AND CHERRY CORDIAL.

Defendants:: John O'Donoghue
Issue Dates:: February 4, 1913

71. (N. J. 41.) ADULTERATION OF WATER. (GREAT BEAR SPRING.)

Defendants:: Great Bear Spring Company, of Washington, D. C.
Issue Dates:: March 16, 1909

72. (N. J. 45.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF WHISKEY. (AS TO COLOR, AGE, AND SOURCE.)

Defendants:: Chas. H. Ross & Company
Issue Dates:: March 29, 1909

73. (N. J. 59.) ADULTERATION AND MISBRANDING OF LITHIA WATER. (BASIC LITHIA WATER.)

Defendants:: Otis H. Wood of Washington, D. C.
Issue Dates:: May 17, 1909

74. (N. J. 107.) MISBRANDING OF VERMONT OR MAPLE SUGAR. (AS TO PRESENCE OF CANE SUGAR.)

Defendants:: J. M. Beeman & Son, of Fairfax, Vt.
Issue Dates:: November 11, 1909

75. (N. J. 134.) MISBRANDING OF "BUCHU GIN."

Defendants:: A. E. Beitzel
Issue Dates:: February 8, 1910

76. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 145, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF SEEDLESS RAISINS.

Defendants:: Connecticut Pie Company
Issue Dates:: February 2, 1910

77. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 146, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT, THE ADULTERATION OF RAISINS.

Defendants:: John C. Berg
Issue Dates:: February 2, 1910

78. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 153, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF PEACHES.

Defendants:: Henry P. Kern
Issue Dates:: February 8, 1910

79. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 160, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. MISBRANDING OF "BUCHU GIN."

Defendants:: Dr. Bouvier Specialty Co.
Issue Dates:: February 10, 1910

80. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 162, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF SEEDLESS RAISINS.

Defendants:: John C. Ewald
Issue Dates:: February 8, 1910

81. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 188, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF CURRANTS.

Defendants:: Michael Holzbeierlein
Issue Dates:: March 4, 1910

82. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 201, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. MISBRANDING OF A DRUG "MAKE-MAN TABLETS."

Defendants:: Phillip G. Affleck
Issue Dates:: March 16, 1910

83. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 205, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. MISBRANDING OF A DRUG "RADAM'S MICROBE KILLER."

Defendants:: Dean Swift Co.
Issue Dates:: March 16, 1910

84. NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 368, FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. ADULTERATION OF PEANUTS.

Defendants:: W. Alfred Farr, of Washington, D. C.
Issue Dates:: June 16, 1910

85. 15645. Adulteration of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 447 Cases of Canned Tomatoes. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Austin, Nichols & Co.
Issue Dates:: December, 1928

86. 15655. Adulteration of apple butter. U. S. v. 30 Pails of Apple Butter. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Austin Nichols Co.
Issue Dates:: December, 1928

87. 11349. Misbranding of flour. U. S. v. 840 Sacks of Flour. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: Rice-Schmidt Baking Co., Washington, D. C.
Issue Dates:: June, 1923

88. 10683. Misbranding of Aspironal. U. S. v. 10 1/2 Dozen Bottles of Aspironal. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Aspironal Laboratories, Inc., Atlanta, Ga.
Issue Dates:: November 23, 1922

89. 10736. Adulteration and misbranding of cottonseed meal. U. S. v. 170 Bags of Cottonseed Meal. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: Eastern Cotton Oil Co., Edenton, N. C
Issue Dates:: December 18, 1922

90. 10737. Misbranding of olive oil. U. S. v. 8 Cans of Olive Oil. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: European Export Corp.
Issue Dates:: December 18, 1922

91. 10745. Misbranding of grape jam. U. S. v. 11 Cases of Schuhle's Grape Jam. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: Schuhle's Pure Grape Juice Co.
Issue Dates:: December 18, 1922

92. 10746. Misbranding of oil. U. S. v. 18 Cans of Oil. Decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product ordered destroyed.

Defendants:: D. Lamp, New York, N. Y.
Issue Dates:: December 18, 1922

93. 10747. Adulteration and misbranding of olive oil. U. S. v. 85 Cans of Olive Oil. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction

Defendants:: D. Lamp, New York, N. Y.
Issue Dates:: December 18, 1922

94. 10748. Misbranding of olive oil. U. S. v. 21 Cans, more or less, of Olive Oil. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: G. P. Papadopulos, New York, N. Y.
Issue Dates:: December 18, 1922

95. 10759. Misbranding of Aspironal. U. S. v. 19 Dozen Bottles, et al, of Aspironal. Default decrees of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Aspironal Laboratories, Inc., Atlanta, Ga.
Issue Dates:: December, 1922

96. 10775. Misbranding of Nonpareil food for hogs and Nonpareil food for stock. U. S. v. 38 Packages of Nonpareil Food for Hogs, et al. Default decrees of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: B. T. Bready, Frederick, Md.
Issue Dates:: December, 1922

97. 10868. Adulteration and misbranding of table oil. U. S. v. 70 Cans of Table Oil. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Fernando Sari
Issue Dates:: January, 1923

98. 11078. Adulteration and misbranding of butter. U. S. v. 18 Cases of Butter. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: Western Creamery Co.
Issue Dates:: February 21, 1923

99. 11079. Adulteration and misbranding of butter. U. S. v. 5 Tubs of Butter. Consent decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Rushmore Creamery Co., Rushmore, Minn.
Issue Dates:: February 21, 1923

100. 11086. Adulteration and misbranding of potatoes. U. S. v. 200 Sacks of Potatoes. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: F. D. Parrish, Washington, D. C.
Issue Dates:: February 21, 1923