1. 19651. Misbranding and alleged adulteration of B. & M. U. S. v. 17 Large Bottles, et al., of B. & M. Hearing on exceptions to libel. Court sustains claimant's exceptions to charges that article was adulterated, sustains further exceptions to libel on contention that statements, alleged to be false and misleading, concerning strength of article appearing in booklet contained within the package, does not constitute misbranding, but overruled claimant's exception to the remaining charge. Tried to a jury on misbranding charge based on false and fraudulent curative and therapeutic claims. Verdict for the Government. Decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. Defendants: F. E. Rollins Co., Boston, Mass. Issue Dates: January, 1933
2. 19652. Adulteration and misbranding of B. & M. U. S. v. 145 Small and 164Large Bottles of B. & M. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. Defendants: F. E. Rollins Co. Issue Dates: January, 1933
