FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966


Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Defendants Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc. Remove constraint Defendants: Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.

Search Results

1. 3381. Alleged misbranding of Nutrilite Food Supplement. U. S. v. 91 Packages, etc. (and 9 other seizure actions). Claimant files answers denying product misbranded . Court denies claimant's motion to consolidate and remove libels to Southern District of California for trial; libels ordered removed and consolidated for trial in Northern District of California. Consent decrees entered providing for delivery of product to charitable institutions.

2. 3382. Suit for injunction to restrain prosecution of pending seizures of Nutrilite Food Supplement; to enjoin institution of additional seizures; and to test constitutionality of Section 304 (a) of the Act and administrative action taken thereunder. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc., v. Oscar R. Ewing, Paul B. Dunbar, Charles W. Crawford, Louis D. Elliott, George P. Larrick, and Tom C. Clark. Motion for dismissal denied; defendants' petition to Supreme Court for writ of prohibition denied. Tried before three-judge court. Decree of permanent injunction; decree reversed upon appeal to Supreme Court.