« Previous
Next »
Titles
- 10318. Adulteration and misbranding of tomato puree. U. S. v. Stockton Food Products, Inc. Plea of guilty. Fine, $2,000.1
- 11260. Adulteration and misbranding of tomato puree. U. S. v. Califruit Canning Co., a partnership, Dino A. Volandri, Alfred Volandri, and Silvio Montanelli. Pleas of guilty. Fines of $250 against the partnership defendant and $5.00 against each of the individual defendants.1
- 11460. Adulteration of tomato puree. U. S. v. Ensher, Alexander and Barsoom, Inc., and Homer E. Ensher. Pleas of guilty. Fine, $250.1
- 11804. Adulteration of tomato puree. U. S. v. Riverbank Canning Co., a corporation, and Lorenzo Zerillo and Samuel P. Cava. Pleas of nolo contendere. Corporation fined $500; Lorenzo Zerillo, $750; and Samuel P. Cava, $2501
- 11805. Adulteration of tomato puree. U. S. v. San Jose Canning Co. and Eugene J. Filice. Pleas of nolo contendere. Fines of $150 against the firm and $3 against Eugene J. Filice.1
- 16289. Adulteration of tomato puree. U. S. v. 1,622 Cases.1
- 20055. Adulteration of tomato puree. U. S. v. 1,880 Cases, et al., of Tomato Puree. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.1
- 3800. Adulteration of tomato puree. U. S. v. Pacific Preserve Co. Plea of guilty. Fine, $150.1
- 8460. Adulteration and misbranding of tomato puree. U. S. v. San Martin Canning Co. Plea of nolo contendere. Fine, $400.1
- 9370. Adulteration of tomato puree. U. S. v. 150 Cases of Canned Tomato Puree. Default decree of condemnation and destruction.1