« Previous
Next »
Titles
- 11259. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. Ripley Canning Co. Plea of nolo contendere. Fine, $250.1
- 12176. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 1,800 Cases.1
- 14745. Adulteration of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. Robert Earl Craddock, Sr. (Halls Canning Co.). Plea of nolo contendere. Fine, $350.1
- 15096. Adulteration of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. Louis H. Herndon (Humboldt Canning Co.). Plea of nolo contendere. Fine, $500.1
- 18482. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 1,128 Cases.1
- 23909. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 781 Cases and 241 Cases of Canned Tomatoes. Decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond to be relabeled.1
- 5739. Adulteration of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 300 Cases of Canned Tomatoes. Decree of condemnation. Product ordered released under bond for segregation and destruction of the unfit portion.1
- 6357. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 474 Cases of Canned Tomatoes. Decree of condemnation. Product ordered released under bond for relabeling.1
- 7839. Adulteration of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 84 Cases of Canned Tomatoes. Default decree of condemnation. Product ordered segregated and the good portion donated to charity.1
- 8454. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 603 Cases of Canned Tomatoes (and 2 other seizure actions against canned tomatoes). Consent decrees of condemnation. Product ordered released under bond.1