Product Keywords: peaches - FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966 Search Results

Start Over Product Keywords peaches ✖

1. 6535. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. Oliver P. Roberts, James H. Roberts, William H. Roberts, M. Raymond Roberts, and James O. Langrail, copartners (Roberts Bros.). Plea of nolo contendere. Fine, $50 and costs.

Defendants:: Oliver P. Roberts, James H. Roberts, William H. Roberts, M. Raymond Roberts, and James O. Langrall, copartners, trading as Roberts Bros., Fort Valley, Ga.
Issue Dates:: December 29, 1919

2. 6406. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 500 and 700 Cases Peaches. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Vam & Piatt, Marshallville, Ga
Issue Dates:: August 20, 1919

3. 6024. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 179 Cases of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Fort Valley Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: June 17, 1918

4. 3199. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 114 Cases of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Wenatchee Ice Cold Storage and Canning Co., Wenatchee, Wash.
Issue Dates:: September 11, 1914

5. 3145. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 4 Bags of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Hamlin and Co.
Issue Dates:: September 11, 1914

6. 29361. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. 125 Baskets of Peaches. Default decree of destruction.

Defendants:: W. J. Brazey
Issue Dates:: January 1939

7. 29152. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. 471 Baskets of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation and destruction.

Defendants:: Artis L. Smith
Issue Dates:: December 1938

8. 26586. Misbranding and alleged adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 119 Bushels of Peaches. Decree of condemnation. Product released under bond to be relabeled.

Defendants:: John Spence
Issue Dates:: June 1937

9. 26585. Misbranding and alleged adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 93 Bushels of Peaches. Decree of condemnation. Product ordered released under bond to be relabeled.

Defendants:: Campbell & Colace, Philadelphia, Pa.
Issue Dates:: June 1937

10. 22722. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. J. Linn Helms (Hoyle & Helms). Plea of guilty. Fine, $25.

Defendants:: J. Linn Helms, trading as Hoyle & Helms, Thomaston, Ga.
Issue Dates:: March 1935

11. 22695. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. William Ogden Britt (Britt & Son). Plea of guilty. Fine, $50.

Defendants:: William Ogden Britt, trading as Britt & Son, Thomaston, Ga.
Issue Dates:: March 1935

12. 21898. Adulteration and misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. 500 Baskets of Fresh Peaches. Default decree of forfeiture. Product ordered sold.

Defendants:: Britt & Co.
Issue Dates:: September 1934

13. 21385. Adulteration and misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. 700 Half -Bushel Baskets of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation and forfeiture, with provision for delivery of portions fit for food to veterans' hospital.

Defendants:: Hoyle & Helms, Thomaston, Ga.
Issue Dates:: August 1934

14. 16124. Adulteration and misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. 396 Baskets, et al., of Peaches. Default decrees of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: C. L. Pennington
Issue Dates:: July, 1929

15. 12475. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Standard Growers Exchange, a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $10 and costs.

Defendants:: Standard Growers Exchange
Issue Dates:: December, 1924

16. 11968. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Standard Growers Exchange, a Corporation. Pleas of guilty. Fine, $50.

Defendants:: Standard Growers Exchange, a corporation, trading at Macon, Ga.
Issue Dates:: May 12, 1924

17. 11967. Misbranding of peaches.. U. S. v. Albert J. Evans and Samuel B. Hungerford (Hungerford & Evans). Pleas of guilty. Fine, $35.

Defendants:: Albert J. Evans and Samuel B. Hungerford, copartners, trading as Hungerford & Evans, Gray, Ga.
Issue Dates:: May 12, 1924

18. 11966. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Albert J. Evans. Plea of guilty. Fine, $25.

Defendants:: Albert J. Evans, Hillsboro, Ga.
Issue Dates:: May 12, 1924

19. 11020. Misbranding of peaches, U. S. v. Combination Orchard Co., a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $75.

Defendants:: Combination Orchard Co., a corporation, trading at Winona, Tex.
Issue Dates:: January, 1923

20. 10664. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. The Danbury Fruit Co, a corporation. Plea of nolo contendere. Fine, $10 and costs.

Defendants:: Danbury Fruit Co., a corporation, Danbury, Ohio
Issue Dates:: November 23, 1922

21. 10517. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 26 Cases, 31 Cases, and 47 Boxes of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Johnston-Cox-Mann Co.
Issue Dates:: October 14, 1922

22. 10157. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Georgia Mountain Orchard Co., a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $25.

Defendants:: Georgia Mountain Orchard Co. [Georgia Mountain Orchards], a corporation, Cornelia, Ga.
Issue Dates:: May 12, 1922

23. 10076. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Associated Fruit Co., a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $5 and costs.

Defendants:: Associated Fruit Co., a corporation, Delta, Colo.
Issue Dates:: May 5, 1922

24. 10072. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Thomas Hilton Peppers. Plea of guilty. Fine, $5 and costs.

Defendants:: Thomas Hilton Peppers, Hotchkiss, Colo.
Issue Dates:: May 5, 1922

25. 10013. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Charles E. Dean. Plea of guilty. Fine, $5 and costs.

Defendants:: Charles B. Dean, Marble Hill, Ind.
Issue Dates:: 1922