Product Keywords: peaches - FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966 Search Results

Start Over Product Keywords peaches ✖

1. 21385. Adulteration and misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. 700 Half -Bushel Baskets of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation and forfeiture, with provision for delivery of portions fit for food to veterans' hospital.

Defendants:: Hoyle & Helms, Thomaston, Ga.
Issue Dates:: August 1934

2. 21898. Adulteration and misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. 500 Baskets of Fresh Peaches. Default decree of forfeiture. Product ordered sold.

Defendants:: Britt & Co.
Issue Dates:: September 1934

3. 22695. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. William Ogden Britt (Britt & Son). Plea of guilty. Fine, $50.

Defendants:: William Ogden Britt, trading as Britt & Son, Thomaston, Ga.
Issue Dates:: March 1935

4. 22722. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. J. Linn Helms (Hoyle & Helms). Plea of guilty. Fine, $25.

Defendants:: J. Linn Helms, trading as Hoyle & Helms, Thomaston, Ga.
Issue Dates:: March 1935

5. 6406. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 500 and 700 Cases Peaches. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Vam & Piatt, Marshallville, Ga
Issue Dates:: August 20, 1919

6. 6535. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. Oliver P. Roberts, James H. Roberts, William H. Roberts, M. Raymond Roberts, and James O. Langrail, copartners (Roberts Bros.). Plea of nolo contendere. Fine, $50 and costs.

Defendants:: Oliver P. Roberts, James H. Roberts, William H. Roberts, M. Raymond Roberts, and James O. Langrall, copartners, trading as Roberts Bros., Fort Valley, Ga.
Issue Dates:: December 29, 1919

7. 6024. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 179 Cases of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Fort Valley Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: June 17, 1918

8. 3145. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 4 Bags of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Hamlin and Co.
Issue Dates:: September 11, 1914

9. 3199. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 114 Cases of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Wenatchee Ice Cold Storage and Canning Co., Wenatchee, Wash.
Issue Dates:: September 11, 1914

10. 16124. Adulteration and misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. 396 Baskets, et al., of Peaches. Default decrees of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: C. L. Pennington
Issue Dates:: July, 1929

11. 11966. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Albert J. Evans. Plea of guilty. Fine, $25.

Defendants:: Albert J. Evans, Hillsboro, Ga.
Issue Dates:: May 12, 1924

12. 11967. Misbranding of peaches.. U. S. v. Albert J. Evans and Samuel B. Hungerford (Hungerford & Evans). Pleas of guilty. Fine, $35.

Defendants:: Albert J. Evans and Samuel B. Hungerford, copartners, trading as Hungerford & Evans, Gray, Ga.
Issue Dates:: May 12, 1924

13. 11968. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Standard Growers Exchange, a Corporation. Pleas of guilty. Fine, $50.

Defendants:: Standard Growers Exchange, a corporation, trading at Macon, Ga.
Issue Dates:: May 12, 1924

14. 10157. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Georgia Mountain Orchard Co., a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $25.

Defendants:: Georgia Mountain Orchard Co. [Georgia Mountain Orchards], a corporation, Cornelia, Ga.
Issue Dates:: May 12, 1922

15. 10517. Adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 26 Cases, 31 Cases, and 47 Boxes of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Johnston-Cox-Mann Co.
Issue Dates:: October 14, 1922

16. 10664. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. The Danbury Fruit Co, a corporation. Plea of nolo contendere. Fine, $10 and costs.

Defendants:: Danbury Fruit Co., a corporation, Danbury, Ohio
Issue Dates:: November 23, 1922

17. 11020. Misbranding of peaches, U. S. v. Combination Orchard Co., a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $75.

Defendants:: Combination Orchard Co., a corporation, trading at Winona, Tex.
Issue Dates:: January, 1923

18. 12475. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Standard Growers Exchange, a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $10 and costs.

Defendants:: Standard Growers Exchange
Issue Dates:: December, 1924

19. 10013. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Charles E. Dean. Plea of guilty. Fine, $5 and costs.

Defendants:: Charles B. Dean, Marble Hill, Ind.
Issue Dates:: 1922

20. 10072. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Thomas Hilton Peppers. Plea of guilty. Fine, $5 and costs.

Defendants:: Thomas Hilton Peppers, Hotchkiss, Colo.
Issue Dates:: May 5, 1922

21. 10076. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. Associated Fruit Co., a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $5 and costs.

Defendants:: Associated Fruit Co., a corporation, Delta, Colo.
Issue Dates:: May 5, 1922

22. 26585. Misbranding and alleged adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 93 Bushels of Peaches. Decree of condemnation. Product ordered released under bond to be relabeled.

Defendants:: Campbell & Colace, Philadelphia, Pa.
Issue Dates:: June 1937

23. 26586. Misbranding and alleged adulteration of peaches. U. S. v. 119 Bushels of Peaches. Decree of condemnation. Product released under bond to be relabeled.

Defendants:: John Spence
Issue Dates:: June 1937

24. 29152. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. 471 Baskets of Peaches. Default decree of condemnation and destruction.

Defendants:: Artis L. Smith
Issue Dates:: December 1938

25. 29361. Misbranding of peaches. U. S. v. 125 Baskets of Peaches. Default decree of destruction.

Defendants:: W. J. Brazey
Issue Dates:: January 1939